For decades, America’s AAA credit rating has been a symbol of the nation’s unquestioned economic might and fiscal reliability. However, this long-standing reputation began to fracture during the Great Recession as unprecedented government spending collided with shrinking revenues and mounting debt. A few years later, the nation was dealt another blow to its already battered financial psyche. In 2011, Standard & Poor’s downgraded the United States’ credit rating for the first time in history, sparking fears that Washington might no longer be steering a stable financial course. Fitch Ratings made a similar move in 2023 after a political stalemate over the debt ceiling raised the specter of default. Fast forward to 2025, and history seems to be repeating itself.
On May 16, Moody’s Investors Service announced a cut to its rating on U.S. long-term debt from AAA to Aa1, stripping away the final badge of top-tier creditworthiness and confirming what many have quietly feared—America’s fiscal foundation may no longer be unshakable. Each downgrade has had its own spark, yet all trace back to the same tinderbox: soaring federal debt, rising interest costs, and a political system that struggles to address either. To understand why Moody’s finally decided to knock America off the top rung, we need to revisit those earlier downgrades by S&P and Fitch, and explore the fiscal and political saga that led us here. It’s a story of big deficits, near-default showdowns, economic crossroads, and the tug-of-war between investing in the nation’s future and managing the bills coming due.
S&P’s 2011 Bombshell Marked the First Crack in America’s Credit
For generations, “AAA” wasn’t just a rating but a promise. U.S. government debt, backed by the full faith and credit of the nation, had long been considered the gold standard. So when Standard & Poor’s downgraded America’s credit from AAA to AA+ on August 5, 2011, it felt like a financial earthquake. The trigger? A bitter standoff in Congress over raising the debt ceiling. What followed wasn’t default, but something nearly as damaging: a shattered illusion that Washington could always be trusted to manage its finances.
The roots of that downgrade trace back to the wreckage of the 2008 financial crisis. As the economy buckled, Washington stepped in with bailouts and stimulus checks to keep the system afloat. Deficits ballooned. In 2009 alone, the shortfall surpassed $1.4 trillion. Tax revenues collapsed, while emergency spending surged. By 2011, recovery was underway, but the debt had doubled from pre-crisis levels.
Fueled by the Tea Party, a newly empowered Republican House demanded steep spending cuts in exchange for approving more borrowing. As the clock ticked down, the U.S. inched dangerously close to default. At the last possible moment, a deal was struck. The Budget Control Act trimmed future spending growth, avoided default, and temporarily calmed markets. But for S&P, it wasn’t enough. The agency had made its expectations clear. It wanted not just a short-term patch, but a credible, long-range plan to stabilize U.S. debt. What it got instead was a political bandage. In its downgrade statement, S&P bluntly concluded the agreement “falls short of what…would be necessary to stabilize the government’s medium-term debt dynamics.”
Even more troubling than the numbers was what the crisis exposed about Washington. S&P warned that America’s governance had grown “less stable, less effective, and less predictable.” Partisan deadlock had made fiscal planning nearly impossible. The budget deal tiptoed around entitlements and ignored new revenue entirely, two areas S&P saw as unavoidable for any real reform. Lawmakers, it seemed, had done little more than postpone the inevitable.
While Moody’s and Fitch declined to follow S&P in 2011, their patience wasn’t unconditional. Fitch placed the U.S. on negative watch later that year and again during a near-identical showdown in 2013. Throughout the rest of the 2010s, the anxiety never fully disappeared. The entitlement programs S&P flagged (Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security) were still on autopilot expansion as the Baby Boom generation retired. Partisan battles over taxes and spending continued to simmer. And no one had touched the debt ceiling, that quirk of law that periodically requires Congress to authorize borrowing to pay for spending it had already approved. Behind the scenes, the stage was being set for another showdown.
The Road to Fitch 2023: Debt, Deficits, and Political Deadlock
By the late 2010s, the fiscal restraint ushered in by the 2011 Budget Control Act had largely dissipated. Despite years of economic growth from 2016 to 2019, the U.S. failed to capitalize on the boom with responsible budgeting. Instead of narrowing deficits, Washington did the opposite. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 slashed corporate and individual taxes, adding an estimated $1.5 trillion to the deficit over a decade. At the same time, bipartisan deals lifted caps on both military and domestic outlays. By 2019, well before the world had heard of COVID-19, the U.S. was again running deficits near $1 trillion, despite low unemployment and steady GDP growth.
Then the pandemic hit, and with it, any remaining semblance of fiscal discipline vanished. Faced with economic catastrophe, both the Trump and Biden administrations responded with multi-trillion-dollar rescue packages. Stimulus checks, expanded unemployment benefits, small business loans, and state aid flooded the economy. While these actions may have prevented a collapse, they also detonated the deficit. In fiscal 2020 alone, the shortfall soared to a record $3.1 trillion. Public debt spiked to around 100% of GDP, or closer to 125% when including intragovernmental holdings, levels not seen since World War II.
Sources: Congressional Budget Office (historical federal debt held by the public); The New York Times
Few raised alarm bells initially. The crisis was seen as a one-time shock, and interest rates had plunged to near-zero, making the debt easier to bear. Borrowing, for a brief moment, felt almost free. Investors lined up to lend, and the government obliged. But by 2022, that illusion began to crack. Inflation, dormant for years, surged to four-decade highs. The Federal Reserve responded with rapid-fire interest rate hikes, jolting borrowing costs upward. For Uncle Sam’s budget, this was a game changer. Trillions in existing debt would progressively roll over at higher rates, and new borrowing was now far more expensive.
The federal government’s annual interest bill nearly doubled in just three years, from $345 billion in 2020 to $659 billion in 2023. That $659 billion wasn’t buying bridges, defense systems, or schools. It was paying bondholders. In 2023, interest payments alone consumed a larger share of the budget than education, veterans’ benefits, or food assistance. Only Social Security, Medicare, and defense took up more.
Meanwhile, the deficits kept piling up. By 2023, the government was borrowing roughly one in every four dollars it spent, levels typically seen only in wartime or severe recessions. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) warned of trillion-plus deficits as far as the eye could see, driven by rising costs for retirement and healthcare programs, higher interest payments, and a tax system that wasn’t keeping up. America’s fiscal house was looking increasingly shaky, even as the foundation of its economy, a dynamic private sector, remained strong.
And then, politics stepped in to pour salt on the wound. In 2023, a familiar drama played out on Capitol Hill: a bitter partisan standoff over raising the debt ceiling. Once again, brinkmanship brought the U.S. uncomfortably close to default. With a hard deadline approaching in late May 2023 when the Treasury would run out of cash, negotiations between President Biden and the Republican-led House went down to the wire. Only in the eleventh hour did both sides pass the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023, suspending the debt limit for two years and putting modest caps on spending growth.
Enter Fitch Ratings. Throughout 2023, as inflation and rates climbed and Congress sparred over the debt limit, Fitch had been watching closely. In late May, amid the debt ceiling impasse, Fitch put the U.S. on “Rating Watch Negative,” signaling that a downgrade was possible. Even after the debt limit was lifted, Fitch did not stand down. They were assessing not just the fiscal numbers but the governance around those numbers, and the picture wasn’t pretty. On August 1, 2023, Fitch stunned many by following through, downgrading the U.S. from AAA to AA+. Suddenly, S&P was no longer alone in doubting America’s AAA credibility.
Fitch’s rationale sounded like a déjà vu of S&P 2011, but with an extra decade of context. The agency cited three main factors for the downgrade: (1) an “erosion of governance” in U.S. economic policymaking relative to peers over the last 20 years, (2) an expected deterioration in the U.S. fiscal outlook over the next few years, and (3) a high and growing government debt burden. In plain English, Fitch saw Washington’s political dysfunction, repeated debt-ceiling standoffs, and the ballooning debt as all intertwined. The U.S., in Fitch’s view, just wasn’t managing its finances or its politics as well as other AAA countries like Germany or Australia.
America’s AAA No More
For over a decade, Moody’s stood alone, the last holdout among the Big Three rating agencies that had kept the U.S. at AAA. Even as Standard & Poor’s downgraded in 2011, and Fitch followed suit in 2023, Moody’s clung to the belief that America’s institutional strength and economic scale justified its AAA badge. But warnings began to surface, and in late 2023, the agency made clear that its patience was not infinite. If the numbers kept worsening and the politics kept fraying, a downgrade would no longer be theoretical.
That moment arrived in mid-May. Citing “rising fiscal deficits with no long-term solution in sight” and “a weakening institutional framework,” Moody’s stripped the United States of its coveted AAA rating. For the first time ever, all three major rating agencies now agreed the United States was not quite “risk-free” at the very top tier. America’s credit report now has an A- rating, not failing by any means, but no longer perfect.
Experts say the timing of the downgrade was hardly coincidental. As Washington has floated new tax cuts and spending packages without meaningful offsets, Moody’s sees a government repeating its mistakes. The agency flagged one metric in particular: interest costs. These obligations, it noted, are “increasing more rapidly than anticipated” – tightening the noose around federal finances. Even assuming a steady economy, the debt is expected to surge from 98% of GDP in 2024 to 134% by 2035. The takeaway? The U.S. is still living far beyond its means, and Moody’s no longer believes this trend will reverse on its own.
Another key factor cited is the governance and political dysfunction, which Moody’s has been evaluating carefully. Due to partisan polarization, the agency worries that U.S. fiscal policymaking has become less reliable. Frequent last-minute budget deals, threats of government shutdowns, and the use of the debt ceiling as a bargaining chip all signal a degraded ability to manage the nation’s finances prudently. While Moody’s acknowledged U.S. strengths, like a huge, diversified economy, it says those strengths do not immunize the country from the consequences of poor fiscal management.
Reaction to Moody’s downgrade split along expected lines. Many economists and investors saw it as unsurprising, even overdue. “Moody’s is the last of the big three agencies to drop the U.S. credit rating down a notch, so not entirely shocking,” noted Carol Schleif, chief investment strategist at BMO Private Wealth. By 2025, anyone paying attention knew U.S. finances had worsened since the pandemic, so this was more confirmation than revelation. “It basically adds to the evidence that the United States has too much debt,” Professor Darrell Duffie said bluntly.
Despite the fiery reaction on the political front, Moody’s remained studiously non-partisan in its statement. It doesn’t care how the U.S. fixes its debt trajectory, just that it does. The agency even changed the outlook on the U.S. rating to “stable” after the downgrade, implying it’s not planning further downgrades soon, if, and this is a big if, the fiscal situation doesn’t deteriorate more than expected. In other words, Moody’s is saying: we’ve cut you to AA1, and we’ll hold you there for now, but don’t make us do this again.
For everyday Americans, Moody’s downgrade might have felt like just another headline in a chaotic news cycle. After all, nothing immediate happened; the dollar didn’t crash, the stock market didn’t crater overnight, and life went on normally after the weekend it was announced. But the symbolism is powerful. The United States of America, the world’s richest nation, now officially carries more risk (in the eyes of all major rating agencies) than the highest-rated countries. It joined the ranks of other AA+ borrowers – still safe, but not quite the tip-top. Countries like Canada, Australia, Germany, and the Netherlands still enjoy AAA ratings, largely thanks to their prudent fiscal policies or political consensus on budgets. The U.S. now sits a peg below. It’s a bit of a blow to national prestige and a reminder that economic strength can be squandered if not paired with responsible governance.
What Downgrades Mean for You and the World
Now the big question: How do these credit rating downgrades affect ordinary Americans and investors? When S&P downgraded the U.S. in 2011 and Fitch and Moody’s followed in 2023–2025, there was a lot of doom-and-gloom talk. Did the sky fall? No. But that doesn’t mean these events are inconsequential. Experts say they operate more like a slow burn than an explosion, unless they trigger a change in behavior.
Borrowing Costs and Interest Rates
U.S. Treasury bonds are often dubbed the “risk-free asset” because, for decades, the assumption was that Uncle Sam would never default and always pay investors back in full. They form the bedrock collateral for loans, derivatives, and bank reserves worldwide. Even a hint that Treasuries are not risk-free can have outsized effects. Fortunately, a one-notch downgrade to AA+ or Aa1 doesn’t make U.S. debt unsafe.
However, some institutional investors (like certain pension funds or banks) have guidelines that rely on ratings. If all agencies rate the U.S. below AAA, could that change how those institutions treat Treasuries? In 2011, major investors and central banks made clear they would ignore S&P’s downgrade, effectively saying, “We still consider U.S. bonds as good as AAA.” It helped that Moody’s and Fitch hadn’t downgraded them then. But today, with all three on AA+/Aa1, there might be some technical shifts. For example, bank regulators might assign a bit more capital requirement for holding Treasuries (though they largely treat them as risk-free by regulation).
In theory, a lower credit rating leads investors to demand a higher interest rate to lend money, since it’s seen as slightly riskier. We’re talking a few basis points (hundredths of a percent) at first, but on a $30+ trillion debt pile, even a 0.1% higher interest rate can mean billions more in interest costs annually for taxpayers. Over time, that compounds. The Fitch and Moody’s downgrades, coming on top of already higher market rates, could put upward pressure on U.S. borrowing costs at the margins.
For consumers, higher Treasury yields eventually filter through to higher interest rates on mortgages, car loans, student debt, and credit cards, because Treasury rates are the benchmark for many forms of borrowing. So, while one downgrade won’t suddenly make your mortgage unaffordable, the underlying issues causing these downgrades (rising government debt and potential inflation) could lead to a world of generally higher interest rates, making loans costlier for everyone.
Consumers and Everyday Life
If you’re an American with a 401(k) or other investments, you likely saw some short-term dips around these downgrade episodes, but nothing that fundamentally altered your retirement trajectory (especially if you stayed diversified and invested for the long run). The bigger concern is indirect. If the downgrades are harbingers of unchecked debt growth, the eventual consequences could be things people do feel: higher taxes, lower government benefits, or diminished economic opportunities.
Americans under 40, in particular, have grown up in an era of cheap money and expanding government support (from tax credits to healthcare subsidies). The party may not end abruptly, but the hangover in the form of servicing a massive national debt will consume a growing share of future budgets. Experts say that could mean tough choices ahead. Already, net interest payments are crowding out other priorities. If nothing changes, future Congresses might have to consider cutting programs or raising taxes just to cover interest.
Psychological and Reputational Impact
There’s also an intangible but real consequence to these downgrades: a dent in American credibility and confidence. The U.S. has long lectured other nations on prudent fiscal policies. It played a leading role in shaping institutions like the International Monetary Fund, which often urges developing countries to get their debt under control. For the U.S. to be called out for fiscal mismanagement is, frankly, embarrassing. It suggests a kind of hypocrisy: do as we say, not as we do.
This reputational hit could weaken U.S. moral authority in economic diplomacy. When people read that the country’s credit rating has been cut, it feeds a narrative of decline, that America isn’t what it used to be. While that’s more perception than immediate reality, perceptions can influence behavior (for instance, voters might demand more populist economic fixes, or investors might ever so slightly shift some funds toward Europe or Asia where they perceive relatively lower political chaos).
Can Washington Heed the Wake-Up Call?
The phrase “wake-up call” has been repeated ad nauseam by economists in reaction to the recent downgrades. But will Washington actually wake up? History gives reason to be skeptical. With today’s politics more polarized than they’ve been in a long time, finding common ground on budgetary matters is like finding a needle in a haystack. Both sides scream compromise while insisting the other cave first, and millions of Americans bear witness as the country’s credit rating slides in real-time. For now, we live in a paradox. The U.S. economy is fundamentally strong in many ways, yet the U.S. government’s balance sheet is strained, and its politics are strained even more. Moody’s 2025 downgrade is a reminder that no nation’s means are limitless, not even America’s.
Does this credit downtown have you worrying about America’s fiscal foundation and what it could mean for you?
Call (877) 444-0923 to speak with one of our precious metals experts and learn how physical gold and silver can help protect accounts today.
